This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was keep. Tony Sidaway|Talk 18:34, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This entry was never listed on VfD, so I'm listing it here now. CDC(talk) 01:21, 26 May 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Speedy Obviously nonsense, with no context at all. "An Italian Hermit?" Where? What hermit? Obviously just contrived. And really, he spelled "ludicrous" as "ludacris..." --M412k 01:55, 26 May 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Delete. Patent nonsense. The use of the word "insane" to describe Pat Pittavino (who seems to be someone on the City Council of some Australian town) is definetly not POV, and the words "Italian hermit" could describe any number of people. --Aurochs EDIT: Changed my vote to Keep and clean up, as per Robojames's new information.
Delete: Insane article. I love that the casino is a "ludacris" suggestion. My, my, but English is a rare thing. Geogre 03:52, 26 May 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Delete as unverifiable nonsense. BTW, I didn't know Ludacris had started establishing casinos.Keep Robojames rewrite. However, I am highly sceptical of the figure of $14 billion for a casino. Griffith Council wouldn't have that sort of money and I am sceptical that the private sector would be looking at that sort of money. Capitalistroadster 01:24, 27 May 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.