User talk:Notalent

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

November 2008[edit]

Information.svg Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to The Bone People. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Copana2002 (talk) 03:16, 14 November 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

As you can see in this online scanning of The Bone People, not only is the title capitalised on the cover, but Keri Hulme capitalises it in her preface. [1]. If you can find a reliable source that shows that the title should indeed not be capitalised feel free to change it, but it must meet the Wikipedia standards of verifiability. Copana2002 (talk) 04:55, 14 November 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Little Creatures[edit]

"Lion Nathan has a 40% holding." - How sad. Pdfpdf (talk) 11:17, 26 January 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Them's the breaks. Notalent (talk) 04:12, 27 January 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs[edit]

Information.svg Hello Notalent! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 1,792 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

  1. Tom Larkin - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 04:34, 17 January 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Conflict over Fleur Revell[edit]

Hi, Notalent. I see you've had some trouble lately over this article. I don't know who's right and who's wrong, and I don't doubt in the least that your intentions are good, but no one is using the talk page to try to work out the dispute. It's quite clear that all parties are in violation of our policies against edit warring. If you feel there's damaging information being added to the article without reliable, verifiable sources to support that, it would be appropriate to post a complaint to the biographies of living persons notice board. If you don't do that, please try to work out the dispute amicably on the article's talk/discussion page; failing to do that, and just continuing to revert changes puts you at risk for sanctions for edit warring. I mean no disrespect, of course, I just felt you should be informed of this information in case you weren't already aware of it. I've put an identical notice on the other party's talk page, as well. Best,  – OhioStandard (talk) 01:56, 24 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Proposed deletion of As Far as a Life Goes[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article As Far as a Life Goes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

album with no claim of notability. unreferenced since 2007

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 10:16, 19 August 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Proposed deletion of Anyone Can Say Goodbye[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Anyone Can Say Goodbye has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NMUSIC, no substantive coverage by independent and reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:33, 9 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pushover (EP)[edit]

Notice

The article Pushover (EP) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references at all that I can find; appears to be unnotable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. | Naypta opened his mouth at 15:06, 27 December 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]